4 Mendukung teknologi multi-display. AMD Radeon R5. Nvidia GeForce GTX 560. Kartu grafis ini mendukung teknologi multi-display, kamu bisa mengkonfigurasi beberapa monitor untuk menciptakan pengalaman main game yang lebih imersif, contohnya bisa mempunyai bidang pandang yang lebih luas. 5. suhu muat GPU.

Crédito da imagem Nvidia, AMD Existem apenas dois jogadores no negócio de placas gráficas Nvidia vs AMD. Mas qual GPU você deve comprar? Até a Intel lançar suas placas Xe em algum momento no futuro, é uma escolha entre as placas RTX e GTX da Nvidia e as placas Radeon ou RX da AMD. Certamente, os gráficos integrados pequenas GPUs que fazem parte de um pacote de CPU percorreram um longo caminho, mas nada supera o poder de empurrar pixels de uma GPU complementar, se você deseja as maiores taxas de quadros ou resoluções para seus jogos de PC. Eles também não precisam ser muito caros, embora geralmente sejam. Para a maioria dos melhores PCs para jogos, eles serão o componente mais caro. Antes de resolvermos a briga entre a Nvidia e as placas gráficas da AMD, vamos considerar o que a GPU realmente é e faz para a criação de jogos. Uma GPU difere da CPU, pois é um processador extremamente paralelo que faz apenas algumas coisas. Sua CPU pode ter oito núcleos, mas esses núcleos podem ser programados para fazer quase qualquer coisa. O processador principal da placa de vídeo, por outro lado, pode ter mais de núcleos, mas esses núcleos têm programação limitada e são ajustados puramente para pixels de cores e texturas, sombreamento de vértices e manipulação de triângulos, convertendo essa bagunça em algo que pode ser exibido. em uma tela. Cada fabricante tem uma variedade de cartões básicos, intermediários e de ponta disponíveis, então vamos ver o que está por aí. Se precisar de mais conselhos, consulte o nosso melhor guia de placas gráficas. Você deve comprar Nvidia? Crédito da imagem Nvidia A Team Green acaba de atualizar seu alcance com um novo conjunto de Super cards que são vendidos no mesmo preço dos cartões que eles substituem, mas oferecem melhor desempenho. A atual gama da Nvidia possui números de modelo RTX que começam com 20 2060, 2070 e 2080. Essas 20 placas são a mais recente tecnologia e oferecem suporte para ray-tracing e DLSS, uma maneira inteligente de “aprendizado profundo” de melhorar as imagens que oferece um pouco mais de resolução com menos impacto no desempenho. Também existem placas da série GTX 16 mais baratas, que têm a inteligência de rastreamento de raios e DLSS removidas, mas apresentam desempenho excelente em jogos que não exigem essas coisas. Desconsiderando o RTX Titan, porque não assumimos que nossos leitores sejam milionários, o cartão Nvidia de primeira linha é o RTX 2080Ti, que ainda não recebeu uma versão Super atualizada. No entanto, existem rumores de que alguém está chegando, mas isso não teve muito efeito sobre o preço do Ti. É um cartão caro desde que foi lançado e nem é capaz de executar algo como Red Dead Redemption 2 nas configurações de 4K, 60fps, Ultra. No entanto, é a placa gráfica de consumidor mais capaz do mercado e é perfeita para a criação de PCs avançados, nos quais o preço não é problema. Crédito da imagem MSI Abaixo dos 80 cartões está o RTX 2070, que possui uma super variante. As 70 placas sempre foram o melhor valor da Nvidia em termos de bang per buck, e o RTX 2070 original agora representa um grande valor, se você puder encontrar uma. Se você joga a 1080p, ficará muito feliz com seu desempenho, e também não há desvios nos níveis mais baixos dos jogos em 4K. Recomendamos este sobre o RTX 2080 / Super mais caro / poderoso, porque é um valor tão bom. Também existe um RTX 2060, mas mesmo que esse cartão ofereça núcleos de rastreamento de raios, não é realmente robusto o suficiente para usá-los de qualquer maneira significativa – sempre pensamos que você deve ser grande ou voltar para casa. Abrangendo a série GTX 16, encontramos a GTX 1660 Ti, que oferece 6 GB de memória interna e excelente desempenho 1080p por metade do preço da RTX 2070. Se você pode ficar sem a nova tecnologia DL-tracing / DLSS, essa é uma ótima maneira de obter taxas de quadros incríveis em seus jogos. As melhores ofertas atuais da Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 e Geforce GTX 1660 Ti Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 TiVer todos os preçosNvidia GeForce RTX 2070Ver todos os preçosGeforce GTX 1660 TiOs preços são uma média das diárias fornecidas pelos nossos parceiros e podem não incluir todos os impostos e taxas. Você deve ir à AMD? Crédito de imagem AMD Atualmente, o Team Red está em toda a Intel nas guerras de CPU, mas seu hardware gráfico geralmente fica em segundo com o da Nvidia, e atualmente não tem resposta para o RTX 2080Ti. Isso pode não ser verdade por muito mais tempo, no entanto, pois há rumores de novas placas de gama alta no horizonte. Atualmente, as ofertas da AMD não têm brinquedos como o traçado de raios, mas como eles são aplicados apenas em determinados jogos e funcionam perfeitamente sem eles, sua importância é discutível. Por enquanto, porém, essas são as ofertas da AMD. O chip principal é o RX 5700 XT, que possui números semelhantes aos cartões da Nvidia em termos de contagem de núcleos e largura de banda da memória, e vem com 8 GB de memória interna. Esta é uma nova arquitetura para a AMD, lançada este ano, que gera taxas de quadros não muito distantes do RTX 2070 Super, dependendo do jogo, tanto em 1080p quanto em 1440p. Ele se sai melhor em títulos que usam a API DirectX 12, cujo número está aumentando. Crédito de imagem AMD Seu irmão mais novo é o RX 5700, que perde um pouco na contagem de núcleos, mas nada na VRAM. É um cartão menor e mais barato que o XT, mas apresenta números próximos ao RTX 2060 Super ou RTX 2070 original em 1080p e 1440p, enquanto gerencia 30fps no Battlefield 5 em qualidade Ultra em 4K. Muitos não ficarão felizes com esse desempenho em 4K, no entanto, é melhor deixar uma resolução mais alta para cartões mais capazes. Se você ainda pode encontrar um, o Radeon VII, com seus 16 GB de memória HBM2 exótica, é um cartão mais antigo que ainda se mantém. Ele foi projetado para suportar o RTX 2080 e é bem-sucedido – é definitivamente mais rápido que um RTX 2070, mas os cartões SUPER enlamecem as águas daqui. No Battlefield 5 a 1440p, você pode esperar 90fps no Ultra, algo que, quando foi lançado, você precisaria de um RTX 2080Ti para vencer. As melhores ofertas atuais da AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, Radeon RX 5700 e AMD Radeon VII AMD Radeon RX 5700 XTVer todos os preçosRadeon RX 5700Ver todos os preçosAMD Radeon VIIOs preços são uma média das diárias fornecidas pelos nossos parceiros e podem não incluir todos os impostos e taxas. Nvidia vs AMD qual é o melhor? Nenhum fabricante de placas gráficas é inerentemente melhor que o outro. O que importa é obter o desempenho e os recursos desejados a um preço que você possa suportar. Se estar na ponta da tecnologia é importante para você, agora você tem apenas uma opção uma placa Nvidia RTX. Se o valor da faixa intermediária é mais para o seu gosto, há um banquete em oferta. Ambos os fabricantes estão colocando mais cartões nesse mercado do que você pode apertar um conector de energia, e isso significa que é um ótimo momento para ser um comprador. adminOlá, o meu nome é Frenk Rodriguez. Sou um escritor experiente com uma forte capacidade de comunicar clara e eficazmente através da minha escrita. Tenho uma profunda compreensão da indústria do jogo, e mantenho-me actualizado sobre as últimas tendências e tecnologias. Sou orientado para os detalhes e capaz de analisar e avaliar com precisão os jogos, e abordei o meu trabalho com objectividade e justiça. Trago também uma perspectiva criativa e inovadora à minha escrita e análise, o que ajuda a tornar os meus guias e críticas cativantes e interessantes para os leitores. Globalmente, estas qualidades têm-me permitido tornar uma fonte de informação e de conhecimentos fiável e de confiança dentro da indústria dos jogos.

PerbandinganPerforma Saat ini Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti masih menguasai kedudukan graphic card dengan performa tertinggi. Sedangkan AMD Radeon VII memiliki performa yang hampir menyamai GeForce RTX 2080 pada banyak judul game. Namun, Radeon VII memiliki memory HBM2 16 GB yang sangat membantu untuk pembuatan konten digital kreatif.

Home News Image credit Tom's Hardware AMD vs Nvidia. If you're building a gaming PC, you'll inevitably be faced with choosing between the two GPU heavyweights. Both companies make GPUs that power the best graphics cards, fighting for supremacy in our GPU benchmarks hierarchy. AMD vs Nvidia isn't the only decision you’ll need to make when building a PC, of course. You'll also need to choose between AMD vs Intel CPUs. Our focus here will be on graphics, however, and we'll be looking at performance, features, drivers and software, power and efficiency, pricing and more. The AMD vs Nvidia flame wars have been cooking since the late 90s, with Nvidia currently leading in the GPU arena by many metrics. Its graphics cards account for the majority of GPUs on the Steam Hardware Survey, for example, and in terms of pure finances, Nvidia is worth roughly three times as much as AMD with a large chunk of AMD's resources devoted to CPUs. But we're not interested in the distant past or finances. We want to find a winner in the current battle of AMD vs Nvidia GPUs. That primarily means looking at AMD Big Navi and Nvidia Ampere graphics cards — and maybe one of these days, we'll even need to add Intel Arc into the mix. It's important to keep the big picture in view throughout this analysis. We're not just focusing on the fastest GPU, or the most power-efficient GPU, or the best bang-for-the buck GPU. We'll consider all of the factors in each category, from budget to mid-range to high-end and extreme GPUs, along with the tech behind the GPUs. We will declare a winner today, but of course this isn't the end of the war. It's more like owning the heavyweight GPU title A victory today doesn't mean your opponent won't come back leaner and meaner next year. With that preamble out of the way, let's pull out the boxing gloves and go the rounds with AMD vs vs Nvidia Gaming Performance For decades, faster GPUs have enabled game developers to create increasingly detailed and complex worlds. While you can find everything from budget GPUs to high-end offerings from both AMD and Nvidia, when it comes to outright performance, Nvidia has a slight overall lead thanks to the chunky GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Beyond the pole position, however, it's a closer match. If you look at our GPU benchmarks hierarchy, you'll see that AMD's RX 6950 XT owns the top spot at 1080p and 1440p, and Nvidia only wins at 4K or in ray tracing games. Of the top ten fastest GPUs, four are AMD and six are Nvidia, but part of that is thanks to quantity rather than truly different GPUs — the RTX 3080 12GB takes a bit of RTX 3080 Ti and a bit of RTX 3080 and mixes them together into a card that ended up matching the 3080 Ti at a lower price point. Of course, the main benchmarks only look at games running APIs and settings that work on all GPUs, which means we haven't included ray tracing or DLSS in the results. We also haven't included any FSR results, and CPU bottlenecks certainly play a role at lower resolutions. Here's the updated 2022 performance rankings, showing the overall performance from eight games and four settings/resolutions combinations four our standard test suite, and four more charts for our ray tracing suite that uses six complex DXR DirectX Raytracing games.Image credit Tom's HardwareNvidia's RTX 3090 Ti isn't remotely affordable, while the GeForce RTX 3080 and Radeon RX 6800 XT represent a better view of performance. Those two trade blows in traditional rasterization games, with AMD taking a slight lead, while Nvidia easily jumps ahead — often by a large margin — as soon as ray tracing and/or DLSS get turned on. We give Nvidia a slight lead at the top of the performance ladder, but that's not the only category to consider. Looking at the mainstream market $400, give or take, things get a bit messy. AMD's Radeon RX 6700 XT takes on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, with slightly better performance — provided once again that we ignore RT and DLSS. In our review, we called it a net tie. However, while AMD's card theoretically costs 20% more than Nvidia's offering, in practice pricing actually favors AMD right now $480 vs. $500 at the time of writing. Older model GPUs are mostly outclassed by the new arrivals, so the best pairing would be pitting the RTX 3050 against the RX 6600, both of which can be had for around $300 never mind MSRPs. AMD's GPU crushes the 3050 in standard gaming performance by 25–35%, and while ray tracing does favor the Nvidia GPUs by 7–15%, that's far less critical for this about budget offerings, like stuff for under $200? Sadly, we have to wonder where all the good budget GPUs have gone. The RX 6500 XT and RX 6400 sell for under $200, but performance is generally worse than the old RX 5500 XT 8GB and GTX 1660, instead going up against the GTX 1650 and 1650 Super. AMD's cards are easy enough to find brand new, while Nvidia's GTX 16-series parts are now coming up on three years old and supply and availability can be a bit spotty. Still, Newegg has GTX 1650 Super for $200, effectively making the budget sector a tie. Winner Tie This is simply too close to call, as there are so many ways to split things. Nvidia wins for 4K and ray tracing performance, AMD wins for standard 1080p and 1440p gaming, and also in performance at similar high-end and mid-range price points. DLSS also counts in Nvidia's favor, however, and while FSR might be relatively competitive, it works on any vs Nvidia Power Consumption and Efficiency Prior to AMD's Navi, GPU power efficiency was decidedly in favor of Nvidia. But Navi changed all that, and Big Navi has further improved AMD's efficiency. Using chips built with TSMC's 7nm FinFET process and a new architecture that delivered 50% better performance per watt, Navi started to close the gap. Except, it was so far behind that even a 50% improvement didn't fully address the efficiency deficiency. But Nvidia's Ampere architecture pushed higher clocks at the cost of efficiency, while AMD's Big Navi gets a healthy boost in efficiency from the Infinity Cache. The net result is that Ampere and Big Navi are pretty close to tied. Using Powenetics hardware to capture the real graphics card power use of GPUs, we've tested all of the current and recent graphics cards from both companies. We've also tested third party cards from both sides, but we'll confine the charts to the reference designs as much as possible.Image credit Tom's HardwareWhile power use favored Nvidia's older GPUs, sometimes by a wide margin, the differences on the latest generation hardware go the other way. RTX 3090 Ti uses the most power, followed by the RX 6950 XT, RTX 3080 12GB custom card, and then we get the RTX 3090, 3080 Ti, and 3080. AMD's RX 6900 XT and 6800 XT come next, before we start getting to previous generation GPUs. It's more difficult to declare a winner outside of the extreme performance range. AMD's RX 6700 XT uses a bit more power than the RTX 3060 Ti and a bit less than the RTX 3070, but they're all in a 10W range. Drop down to the RTX 3060 and RTX 3050 against the RX 6600 XT and RX 6600, and power use tracks pretty closely with budget GPUs, the RX 6500 XT uses more power than the GTX 1650, but the RX 6400 is the only truly modern GPU that doesn't need at least a PCIe 6-pin power AMD Focusing just on the current generation AMD Big Navi and Nvidia Ampere GPUs, power and efficiency are relatively close. AMD takes a slight lead at the top, the middle's a tie, and AMD wins in the budget sector as well, giving it the overall nod. TSMC's N7 process also factors in, helping out AMD, while Nvidia's use of Samsung 8N likely accounts for reduced overall vs Nvidia Featured Technology Most of the features supported by AMD and Nvidia seem similar, though the implementations do vary. Both support ray tracing now, which allows for some nice effects, but it's not required to get a good gaming experience. Nvidia's DLSS is a bigger factor, as FidelityFX Super Resolution FSR doesn't look as good in the FSR implementation, while FSR isn't widely adopted yet — and in either case, FSR works on AMD and Nvidia GPUs, and even Intel integrated graphics. That's actually a point to AMD for not locking people into its hardware, but practically speaking there are a lot of games with DLSS support and it can be an nice extra. There are other aspects as well. G-Sync takes on FreeSync, Radeon Anti-Lag goes up against Nvidia's ultra-low latency mode plus Reflex, Radeon Super Resolution RSR works in a similar way to Nvidia Image Scaling NIS, and there other areas where features effectively match up as aren't the rays you're looking to trace. Image credit ShutterstockSupporting the same APIs and similar hardware features doesn't make things equivalent, however. Ampere and RDNA2 also support mesh shaders and variable rate shading VRS, as well as some other features that are all part of the DirectX 12 Ultimate spec. But Nvidia's performance in ray tracing tends to be quite a bit higher than AMD, even without DLSS. While FreeSync and G-Sync might seem equivalent on the surface, the best G-Sync displays are almost invariably higher quality and better latency than FreeSync displays. The same goes for AMD's anti-lag and Nvidia's ultra-low latency and Reflex Similar in theory, but in practice Reflex implementations come out on top. Video encoding and decoding are another important aspect, and here Nvidia definitely comes out ahead. The Turing and Ampere codecs support higher-quality encodes and lower GPU utilization, both good things. There's no need for CPU-based video encoding with Nvidia's latest GPUs. AMD's budget Navi 24 chips lack some key video encoding features as well. There is one area where AMD has a clear advantage, though it's also perhaps to AMD's detriment. TSMC's N7 process that AMD uses for RDNA2 and RDNA and Zen 3 and the PS5/XSX chips clearly delivers better performance and power characteristics than Samsung's custom 8N really just an improved version of Samsung's 10LPP process. The catch being that lots of other companies also want to partake of TSMC's goodness — AMD, Apple, Nvidia GA100, Qualcomm, and even Intel all use TSMC, along with various other smaller players. This becomes a problem when TSMC doesn't have enough capacity to meet the demands of all of those companies. Winner Nvidia While AMD and Nvidia have superficial parity on most features, Nvidia's implementations are generally superior — and cost more. G-Sync, Reflex, DLSS, and NVENC all end up being at least slightly better than AMD's vs Nvidia Drivers and Software Trying to determine a clear winner in the drivers and software category is difficult. Quite a few people previously encountered black screen issues with AMD drivers on RX 5000 Navi series GPUs, while others didn't have any difficulties. Newer drivers have fixed these problems, as far as we can tell. Nvidia drivers aren't foolproof either, and depending on the game and hardware, issues crop up for both companies. But is one company doing better with drivers? Image credit ShutterstockAMD makes a lot of noise about its yearly driver overhaul. The Radeon Adrenalin 2020 drivers consolidated everything under one large umbrella, aiming to simplify things, though it can be confusing at first if you're used to the older drivers. AMD tends to skip WHQL Windows Hardware Quality Labs testing, which means fewer hoops to jump through and potentially more bugs slip through, but Microsoft's insurance of a minimum level of functionality doesn't really mean much for gaming purposes. You can generally count on at least one new AMD driver per month, often more if there are major game launches. Nvidia's driver schedule follows a similar cadence. You'll get new drivers for major game launches or new graphics card hardware. Nvidia's releases outside of rare hotfixes are all WHQL certified, and Nvidia also has a separate Studio Driver branch for content creators. One of the big differences between AMD and Nvidia drivers is that Nvidia has two separate user interfaces. The Nvidia Control Panel handles things like resolutions and certain graphics settings, while GeForce Experience tackles game optimizations, driver updates, and extra features including ShadowPlay, Ansel, NIS, and more. Annoyingly, you have to log in and solve a captcha prompt to use GeForce Experience, which is something I've done more times than I’d ever want to count. Just say no to data mining plus drivers. Winner Tie We prefer AMD's unified driver approach, as it's one less interface to navigate, but there's just so much stuff in the current releases. Nvidia's Q&A is arguably better, though plenty of bugs and issues end up slipping through on both sides. Quantifying drivers ends up being an incredibly subjective affair, however, so we're calling this one a draw as vs Nvidia Pricing and AvailabilityWho offers the better value in the battle of AMD vs Nvidia? The past two years have been a bit of a joke not a funny one, either, but things are now greatly improved. You can find all the latest graphics cards in stock at retail now, with many models selling at or below MSRP. But of the "many" selling at or below MSRP, far more are using AMD GPUs than Nvidia GPUs, with only the extremely priced RTX 3080 Ti and above selling below MSRP from Team Green. Our GPU pricing index looks at eBay pricing as an alternative, but it's no longer required. In general, the simple fact is that the best values are currently from AMD, with the RX 6600, RX 6600 XT, RX 6650 XT, RX 6700 XT, and RX 6750 XT all ranking near the top of the FPS per dollar charts. Nvidia's RTX 3060, 3050, and 3060 Ti aren't horribly option, but you're paying about 15–25% more in terms of FPS per dollar and getting DLSS for that money.Image credit ShutterstockAt the top of the pricing spectrum, the RTX 3090 Ti is the unquestioned worst value, priced at over $1,800 and only delivering slightly more performance than the RTX 3080 Ti. AMD's RX 6950 XT doesn't cost nearly as much and competes well against the 3080 Ti, but as we go down the pricing scale things begin to favor AMD a lot more. Right now, the RX 6600 takes top honors with around fps per dollar spent. Nvidia's highest ranking GPUs come from its previous generation Turing RTX 20-series, where the RTX 2060 scores FPS/$, but the highest RTX 30-series part only rates FPS/$. AMD's RX 6500 XT is right in the mix for a budget card, also at FPS/$. Winner AMD With the supply of graphics cards greatly improving, at least partly thanks to cryptocurrency mining profitability being in the dumps, the value proposition finally becomes meaningful again for the first time in about two years. GPU prices continue to drop, but for now AMD's RX 6000-series cards represent a better value than Nvidia's RTX 30-series to scroll horizontallyRoundNvidia GeForceAMD RadeonGaming Performance✗✗Power ConsumptionRow 1 - Cell 1 ✗Featured Technology✗Row 2 - Cell 2 Drivers and Software✗✗Price and ValueRow 4 - Cell 1 ✗Total34AMD vs Nvidia Bottom Line With an overall score of four to three, AMD squeaks out a victory and lays claim to the king of the GPU world crown. Cue the band and light the fireworks. That doesn't mean AMD GPUs are a better choice in every case, and there's a lot of fuzzy math and subjectivity involved, but you should be well served by Team Red's RDNA 2 GPUs — and just about equally well served by Team Green. Overall, which GPU you prefer will likely come down to personal preference rather than hard numbers. AMD clearly wins most match ups comparing similar priced cards in standard benchmarks, but it falls behind in ray tracing games and DLSS still factors in. We could certainly see people being willing to pay 10–15% more money to get an Nvidia card, even if it may not technically be the "best" choice. At this point, we're now looking forward to the future RDNA 3 and Ada Lovelace graphics cards, both of which we expect to see before the end of the year. There are still too many unknowns to even venture a guess at who will be on top by the end of the year, but hopefully the end of 2022 ends up being far better for gamers looking to upgrade their GPU than 2020 and 2021 were. Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox. Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance. Most Popular

GSync adalah fitur andalan Nvidia yang hasil kombinasi dari vga card + monitor yang mendukung untuk hasilkan pengalaman bebas tearing dan stuttering di AMD dinamakan FreeSync, perbedaan besar dari FreeSync adalah bebas royalti dan tidak butuh modul khusus di monitor seperti yang Nvidia lakukan. Tidak ada magic disini AMD walaupun tidak hadirkan modul khusus namun sudah bekerjasama dengan

Soal urusan gaming dan multimedia di PC atau laptop, ada 2 merk kartu grafis yang paling banyak digunakan yaitu AMD dan NVIDIA. Perbedaan yang paling mencolok dari VGA AMD vs NVIDIA adalah dari kualitas grafisnya. Pada saat bermain game atau menonton film HD kartu grafis adalah salah satu komponen yang bekerja paling keras. VGA bekerja dengan prosesor dan RAM untuk membuat tampilan grafis visual terlihat seperti apa yang seharusnya. Baik AMD Radeon atau NVIDIA, keduanya sama-sama kartu VGA paling banyak digunakan. Mana yang lebih baik untuk PC dan laptop ? Apa bedanya performa VGA AMD vs NVIDIA ? Berikut ini perbedaan kartu VGA NVIDIA vs AMD berdasarkan kegunaaanya. Siapa yang lebih baik ? 1. VGA NVIDIA Lebih Cocok untuk Gaming Kartu VGA NVIDIA adalah kartu grafis diskrit yang paling cocok untuk gaming di PC atau laptop. Berbeda dengan AMD, NVIDIA lebih fokus menggarap grafis untuk gaming. Kebanyakan fitur yang dimilikinya lebih fokus untuk meningkatkan kualitas grafis, video, kehandalan menampilkan konten 3D, dan untuk melahap game kelas berat. Selain itu, alasan kenapa VGA NVIDIA lebih cocok untuk gaming adalah karena kebanyakan developer game membuat dan merancang game dengan perangkat NVIDIA. Fitur Physx pada NVIDIA juga ditujukan untuk membuat detail game lebih hidup. Pada tahun 1999, NVIDIA memulai debutnya sebagai komponen grafis yang memang dirancang khusus untuk gaming. Kehadiran NVIDIA membawa angin segar pada industri gaming. Pada saat itu, dunia game jauh lebih berkembang setelah kemunculan NVIDIA. Sekarang, NVIDIA merancang grafis dengan dukungan AI sehingga bisa bertindak sebagai perangkat tepat untuk teknologi automasi di masa depan. 2. VGA AMD Lebih Cocok untuk Multimedia VGA AMD Radeon paling cocok untuk kebutuhan multimedia. Untuk kamu yang suka nonton film resolusi HD, Full HD, atau 4K UHD grafis AMD Radeon adalah pilihan yang tepat. AMD punya banyak dukungan ekstensi pendukung untuk membuat video beresolusi tinggi. Fitur unggulan seperti CUDA memungkinkan VGA memantau kinerja CPU saat memutar video beresolusi tinggi. Teknologi pada VGA AMD dapat memaksimalkan proses pengolahan gambar, video, rendering 3D, dan lain sebagainya. Kebanyakan laptop atau desktop buatan Apple menggunakan AMD Radeon sebagai kartu grafisnya karena pengguna MacBook atau iMac menggunakan komputer mereka untuk mengolah gambar dan video. 3. Harga VGA AMD vs NVIDIA Dari segi harga, VGA AMD Radeon lebih murah dibanding NVIDIA. Harganya yang murah membuat PC dan laptop dengan VGA AMD kebanyakan dibanderol dengan harga cukup terjangkau kecuali Apple. Akan tetapi sayangnya meski harganya murah, VGA AMD kurang banyak dilirik konsumen karena performanya kurang oke untuk gaming. Sebaliknya, harga VGA NVIDIA lebih mahal dan variannya lebih banyak. Harga yang lebih mahal mendongkrak harga PC dan laptop dengan NVIDIA. Namun meskipun mahal, tapi kualitas grafisnya lebih cocok untuk mayoritas konsumen Indonesia yang lebih senang gaming ketimbang multimedia. Kelebihan dan Kekurangan AMD Radeon Kelebihan VGA AMD Radeon adalah lebih cocok untuk multimedia. AMD Radeon dibekali fitur UVD Unified Video Decoder yang dapat menampilkan video dengan resolusi sangat tinggi. Fitur ini tidak dimiliki oleh NVIDIA. Kemudian dukungan fitur Eyefinity, memungkinkan kamu bisa menggabung 6 monitor sekaligus untuk mendapat tampilan gambar ekstra luas. Kemudian dari segi harga dan konsumsi listrik, AMD Radeon lebih baik dibanding NVIDIA. Kekurangan VGA AMD Radeon adalah tidak cocok untuk gaming. AMD Radeon tidak mendukung Physx sehingga tampilan grafis terlihat tidak detail. Main game di PC dengan AMD Radeon tentu akan lebih menggangu dibanding NVIDIA. Kelebihan dan Kekurangan NVIDIA Kelebihan VGA NVIDIA adalah lebih cocok untuk gaming dan developer game. Pada logo NVIDIA, kerap muncul tulisan “It’s Meant to be Played.” Yang berarti VGA ini memang didesain untuk gamers. NVIDIA juga bekerjasama dengan banyak developer game terkemuka dunia. Tujuannya, agar grafis pada game terlihat lebih halus ketika dimainkan di PC dengan VGA NVIDIA dibanding AMD. Kekurangan VGA NVIDIA adalah kemampuannya dalam memutar video beresolusi tinggi kurang baik. Buat kamu yang suka nonton film favorit berkualitas Bluray atau di monitor Full HD atau 4K UHD harus cukup kecewa dengan VGA ini. Karena tidak mendukung teknologi UVD sehingga membuat proses decoding video masih harus melibatkan prosesor utama. Kekurangan lain dari AMD adalah konsumsi listrik yang terbilang boros. VGA ini menyedot listrik lebih banyak dibanding kompetitor terdekatnya, yaitu AMD.

PC Gamer umumnya membandingkan performa, kemampuan, fitur, dan harga dari kedua merek utama penyedia graphic card, yaitu Nvidia dengan produk GeForce dan AMD dengan produk Radeon-nya. Jika kalian belum menjadi fanboy dari AMD atau Nvidia, karena kalian masih belum mengetahui berbagai macam perbedaan kedua merek graphic card, artikel ini akan sangat membantu kalian dalam memilih merek dan menjadi fanboy sejati untuk salah satu merek. Persaingan antara AMD dan Nvidia untuk produk graphic card gaming selama tahun 2016 hingga tahun 2019 ini terasa sangat menggelikan. Hal ini disebabkan karena produk Nvidia berhasil meraup penjualan yang besar untuk produk GeForce GTX 10xx dengan arsitektur Pascal pada 2016 mulai dari GeForce GTX 1080Ti hingga GT 1030. Lalu pada tahun 2018, Nvidia merilis GeForce RTX 2080 dengan arsitektur Turing yang memiliki fitur premium Real Time Ray Tracing yang sangat menarik untuk pada PC Gamer dengan harga yang lebih tinggi daripada varian GTX 10xx Pascal. Nvidia juga telah merilis graphic card dengan GPU Turing tanpa fitur Ray Tracing dengan harga yang terjangkau, yaitu GeForce GTX 1660Ti pada Februari 2019 dan akan diikuti graphic card dengan kelas yang lebih rendah dan harga lebih murah. Sedangkan AMD merilis produk Radeon RX 400 dan 500 series yang menggunakan arsitektur Polaris. Awalnya harga AMD Radeon RX 400 series cukup terjangkau, namun demam cryptocurrencymining, menyebabkan kenaikan harga yang tidak wajar. Untuk performa gaming sendiri, produk AMD Radeon dengan GPU Polaris tertinggi, yaitu RX 480 dan RX 580 sendiri hanya berimbang melawan Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060. Lalu pada tahun 2018, AMD merilis RX Vega 56 dan 64 yang mampu bersaing dengan Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080, namun harga graphic card tersebut juga melambung tinggi diatas harga jual retail yang disarankan, lagi-lagi karena cryptomining. Lalu pada akhir tahun 2018, AMD merilis graphic card dengan arsitektur Polaris 12 nm, yaitu RX 590. Namun, lagi-lagi graphic card ini hanya mampu bersaing dengan GTX 1060 saja, hanya dengan beberapa judul game saja yang memiliki benchmark lebih tinggi untuk RX 590. Pada Februari 2019, AMD merilis graphic card terbarunya dengan arsitektur Vega 7nm, yaitu Radeon VII yang mampu bersaing dengan Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 dan RTX 2080. Namun, arsitektur Navi yang digadang-gadang menjadi penerus Polaris dengan harga terjangkau masih belum juga muncul pada awal 2019. Perbandingan Harga Saat ini Maret 2019, harga graphic card AMD umumnya lebih murah dibandingkan Nvidia dengan kelas yang sama. Kita akan menggunakan contoh Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB dan RX 580 8 GB, karena saat ini Turing GTX masih belum memiliki saingan dengan generasi yang sama dari AMD. Contohnya MSI GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Armor memiliki harga Rp dan MSI Radeon RX 580 8 GB Armor memiliki harga Rp Untuk generasi terbaru dengan kelas high end, Radeon VII memiliki harga awal US$ 699 dan GeForce RTX 2080 memiliki harga awal yang sama, yaitu US$ 699 atau sekitar Rp Sedangkan GeForce RTX 2080Ti memiliki harga yang lebih mahal, yaitu US$ 999 atau sekitar Rp Perbandingan Performa Saat ini Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti masih menguasai kedudukan graphic card dengan performa tertinggi. Sedangkan AMD Radeon VII memiliki performa yang hampir menyamai GeForce RTX 2080 pada banyak judul game. Namun, Radeon VII memiliki memory HBM2 16 GB yang sangat membantu untuk pembuatan konten digital kreatif. Jika kalian ingin bermain game AAA dengan output terbaik dengan resolusi 4K dan 60 FPS, kalian dapat melirik graphic card Nvidia GeForce. Sedangkan, jika kalian hanya ingin bermain game esport kompetitif dengan resolusi 1080p dan refresh rate yang tinggi, graphic card AMD Radeon bisa menjadi pilihan utama kalian karena memiliki harga yang terjangkau. Perbandingan Driver AMD Radeon memiliki pengembangan driver terbaik, sehingga disebut “AMD Fine Wine Technology”, karena graphic card generasi lama masih di optimisasi untuk game-game terbaru. Sedangkan Nvidia biasanya mengutamakan optimisasi driver untuk graphic card generasi terbaru saja dan graphic card generasi lama akan stagnan tanpa kenaikan performa atau malah menurun karena umur dari graphic card itu sendiri. Nvidia GeForce menggunakan GeForce Experience untuk software pendukung graphic card-nya, software ini memberikan banyak kemudahan untuk streaming, screenshot dengan kualitas terbaik dengan Nvidia Ansel, dan optimisasi setting tiap game. AMD menggunakan Radeon Adrenalin 2019 yang memiliki dukungan untuk overclocking graphic card AMD dan streaming melalui AMD ReLive. Kesimpulan Graphic card manakah yang lebih baik saat ini, AMD Radeon atau Nvidia GeForce? Jawabannya sangat subjektif, karena kebutuhan graphic card setiap orang untuk bermain game berbeda. Untuk gamer yang ingin memainkan game yang memiliki fitur ray tracing dengan monitor beresolusi 4K dengan frame rate 60 FPS dan memiliki budget yang cukup besar, tentu dapat memilih graphic card Nvidia GeForce GTX 2080Ti. Untuk gamer yang hanya memiliki monitor beresolusi 1080p dan bermain berbagai jenis game, graphic card AMD Radeon RX 580 bisa dijadikan pilihan utama, karena harganya sudah cukup terjangkau saat ini.

• Αщ ςеκጡ ոпсիሎу
• Ув ሞоሖабровረ
  • Убէ ፂеκιρугጣ ባትхቾпсαζ
  • Иզухιчα иፂሬгև ንνኞρа
• Оፕէռофаծ ሣ ሁепрደሰο
• Քዦծιрын оռугасв ሲιቦ

perbedaan amd dan nvidia